[ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Shahram Javey updated AMQ-992:
------------------------------

    Attachment: patch.txt

The current lock statement with MyISAM tables has led to unstable database. 
After a few hours of use, MySQL database becomes progressively  slower and 
eventually no other process can get any database lock. The only option is to 
kill the slave broker and to restart the database. Assuming that changing the 
table from MyISAM to InnoDB will fix the problem, I've attached a patch to 
alter the storage engine after the tables have been created. Has anyone else 
observed this problem?

> MySQL doesn't honor lock in JDBC Master Slave configuration?
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-992
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-992
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.1.0
>         Environment: RHEL 4
> MySQL 4.x, 5.x
> mysql-ab_jdbc_driver
>            Reporter: Steven Lotito
>             Fix For: 5.1.0
>
>         Attachments: mysql_obtain_lock.txt, patch.txt
>
>
> I have been attempting to get the new 4.1 JDBC Master Slave configuration 
> working with MySQL.
> The log from the first broker to start up states:
> 2006-10-18 09:35:08,558 [main           ] INFO  DefaultDatabaseLocker         
>  - Attempting to acquire the exclusive lock to become the Master broker
> 2006-10-18 09:35:08,559 [main           ] INFO  DefaultDatabaseLocker         
>  - Becoming the master on dataSource: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The 2nd broker to start up has an identical message and both brokers listen 
> for connections.
> The 2nd broker should be waiting for the lock and NOT accepting connections, 
> if I understand http://www.activemq.org/site/jdbc-master-slave.html 
> correctly...
> Oracle exhibits the expected behavior:
> When running the exact same configuration (except using an Oracle 
> datasource), the first broker has the same log message as above,  while the 
> 2nd broker halts at the "Attempting to acquire the exclusive lock to become 
> the Master broker" message until I fail the master.  Then it becomes the 
> master.
> Is this a known issue?  I was able to replicate it using both MySql 4 and 5 
> (trying both the MySQL Connector/J 3.1 and MySQL Connector/J 5.0 drivers)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to