I agree about version numbers in the URI but faintly hold that opinion.
BTW, should there be ASF notices in these schema and on the actual web
page?
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 18, 2008, at 8:26 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I might consider putting a version number in the URI, since if there
are substantial changes to the config format in the future we'll
probably want to use a different URI so we don't have the same URI
mapping to different XSDs for various releases. But your proposal
sounds like at least a step in the right direction, so +1. :)
Thanks,
Aaron
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
The past day I've working hard on getting the activemq.xml to
validate
against our xsd (something that never used to work). And I've
noticed
that the current namespace is less than ideal. It's currently
'http://activemq.org/config/1.0'. I think we should change that to
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core so that it has the proper
hostname and path to where we store our schemas.
Unless someone objects I'm going to update this for the 5.1 release.
This should not impact anybody since our schemas have never validate
before anyways.
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Open Source SOA
http://open.iona.com
