On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:54 AM, James Strachan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/9/3 Gary Tully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Though number of connections in no way reflects the cpu usage of a
>>> broker;
>>>
>> what are you thinking here?
>
> You could have 1000 connections doing very little, waiting for
> messages - but another broker could have one connection sending 5000
> messages/second.
>
> A single connection can use up the entire CPU on a broker; so am not
> sure there's much merrit on associating connection count to cpu usage.
> Though having a maximum allowed connection count is fine though
Yes, and that was my original intent - associating connections a
static limit and with a percentage of the broker's memory usage. As
this discussion about CPU usage unfolded, I thought I must have
completely overlooked a thread in the connection or something.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
Apache Camel - http://activemq.org/camel/
Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
