Threading issues -- Insufficient synchronization in Connection, Session, etc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: AMQNET-112
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-112
             Project: ActiveMQ .Net
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: ActiveMQ Client
            Reporter: Chris Fraire
            Assignee: James Strachan
         Attachments: Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ.patch

I have been debugging some threading issues in NMS, and I have attached a patch 
file with some proposed changes to correct the following issues:

* Some threading issues in Connection, Session, and DispatchingThread
- it is insufficient to use ArrayList.Synchronized or Hashtable.Synchronized 
since enumeration is not synchronized.  Instead, use regular collections and 
explicit locking using a private object, myLock
- instead of Connection.connected, use a volatile single-state-change bool 
called triedConnect, to add synchronization to CheckConnected without 
adversely-affecting performance 
- mark as volatile certain bools which have a single state change (e.g., 
Connection.closed, which starts at false and changes once to true) and then 
double-check for minimal locking
- some uses of AtomicBoolean (e.g., Connection.started) offered insufficient 
code synchronization.  Instead, use regular bool and locking of the 
aforementioned myLock
- remove Connection.closing field, and instead always accommodate that 
Connection.RemoveSession modifies the sessions list.
- instead of (bool) DispatchingThread.m_bStopFlag, use a ManualResetEvent (in 
addition to the existing AutoResetEvent) to signal the worker thread
- in TcpTransport, recognize that ShutdownCommand may cause broker to close 
connection, to avoid a spurious error message
- accommodate potential ThreadAbortExceptions which can occur from 
explicitly-aborted worker threads
- increase the wait for stopping async delivery, from 5 seconds to 30
- use Interlocked.Increment for thread-safe int increments.  
(Interlocked.Increment wraps Int32.MaxValue to Int32.MinValue; will this be a 
problem?)

* Tweak implementation of IDisposeable in TcpTransport, MutexTransport, 
TransportFilter, WireFormatNegotiator so finalizers call Dispose


Thank you,
Chris

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to