Good start! How about you also put those ideas somewhere on the wiki at: http://stomp.codehaus.org/
Some of the things I see missing in STOMP are: - Optional Keep Alive protocol. Right now we have to depend on the OS to detect socket failure to time out a dead client. Would be nice if the client could optionally agree to send a Keep Alive commands when the connection is idle. That way the sever can detect dead clients quicker. - Perhaps standardize a 'host' header in the CONNECT frame to specify the host name that the client is connecting to. This would allow implementing virtual hosting where multiple DNS host entries point at the same STOMP server. Regards, Hiram On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Dejan Bosanac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > in a thread some time ago we discussed new features which could go into > version 1.1 of Stomp protocol. > > Since I'm cross-posting this, I've summarized all these features in a > blog http://www.nighttale.net/stomp/stomp-v11-thoughts.html > > It's basically an invitation to a discussion on whether we should go > with v1.1 or these should be implemented as ActiveMQ-related stuff. > Also, if some of you have items on the wish list, I would like to hear them. > > Cheers > > -- > Dejan Bosanac > > > http://www.ttmsolutions.com - get a free ActiveMQ user guide > > ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > Scripting in Java - http://www.scriptinginjava.net > > -- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com Open Source SOA http://open.iona.com
