[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trevor Pounds reopened AMQ-1804:
--------------------------------
Reopening ticket due to xbean name mapping conflict that may cause problems for
some users. I propose either removing the xbean mapping from the
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConectionFactory class or removing the
org.apache.activemq.spring.ActiveMQConnectionFactory class. Do we need both of
these classes?
> ConnectionFactory classes should have XBean support
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-1804
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1804
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 4.1.2, 5.1.0
> Reporter: Trevor Pounds
> Assignee: Rob Davies
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.2.0
>
> Attachments: r669289.diff
>
>
> It would be nice to have certain objects deriving from
> javax.jms.ConnectionFactory to provide XBean binding support. This would
> really clean up xbean configurations utilizing ActiveMQ connection factories.
> {code:xml|title=current}
> <bean id="pooledFactory"
> class="org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory"
> destroy-method="stop">
> <property name="connectionFactory">
> <bean class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory">
> <property name="brokerURL">
> <value>tcp://localhost:61616</value>
> </property>
> </bean>
> </property>
> </bean>
> {code}
> vs
> {code:xml|title=improved}
> <pooledConnectionFactory id="pooledFactory" destroy-method="stop"
> connectionFactory="#connectionFactory"/>
> <connectionFactory id="connectionFactory" brokerURL="tcp://localhost:61616"/>
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
