This regression is cosmetic but very harmful to the admin UI: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1975
which adds to my negative vote. Although if I had to pick one to be right, the AMQ-1971 is the one. jayson.minard wrote: > > vote -1 due to this issue which still happens on RC2: > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1971 > > It isn't a very complicated setup, just higher volume with medium to large > messages going through and it falls over due to a hole in resource > protection around a queue paging. > > > > Gary Tully wrote: >> >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I've cut a new release candidate for 5.2.0 >> >> Could you guys review the release artifacts and vote? >> >> The release notes are here: >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+5.2.0+Release >> >> You can get the binary distributions here: >> http://people.apache.org/~gtully/staging-repos/activemq-5.2.0/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.2.0 >> >> The Maven2 repository is at: >> http://people.apache.org/~gtully/staging-repos/activemq-5.2.0 >> >> The Maven generated website for this version is at: >> http://people.apache.org/~gtully/staging-sites/activemq-5.2.0/maven/5.2.0 >> >> Source SVN tag: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/tags/activemq-5.2.0 >> >> Please vote to approve this release binary >> >> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.2.0 >> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments) >> >> Here's my +1 >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--ActiveMQ-5.2.0---RC2-tp19874910p19945168.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
