[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=46649#action_46649
]
Albert Strasheim commented on AMQCPP-176:
-----------------------------------------
Now that Python 2.6 has been released, this isn't really a problem for me
anymore.
> Work around Visual Studio .NET 2003 covariant return issues
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQCPP-176
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-176
> Project: ActiveMQ C++ Client
> Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: Albert Strasheim
> Assignee: Timothy Bish
> Fix For: 2.3
>
>
> It would be very useful if something could be done in the AMQCPP code to work
> around the issues Visual Studio .NET 2003 has with having base classes with
> virtual functions as covariant return types.
> These problems are alluded to here:
> http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=23760&SiteID=1
> Some ideas have been discussed here:
> http://www.nabble.com/Unable-to-comile-C%2B%2B-client-on-VC%2B%2B-2003-td14680479s2354.html
> but I'm hoping there might be a way to slightly restructure the AMQCPP code
> instead of resorting to preprocessor directives.
> Any ideas I could try would be much appreciated.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
