Yeah, it does not have to go through the incubator. There is a board meeting in a few weeks, so we may be able to iron things before so that we can send a proposal. This could mean if might be done by the end of the year.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 8:03 PM, Claus Ibsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > That would be really great. Also if TLP then the urls for the xsd schema > should have a new home, so if that can be done before 2.0 then it would be > cool. > > However how long time does such a transition take? I anticipate its much > faster than the incubator projects that IMHO takes well .. very long time. > > > > Med venlig hilsen > > Claus Ibsen > ...................................... > Silverbullet > Skovsgårdsvænget 21 > 8362 Hørning > Tlf. +45 2962 7576 > Web: www.silverbullet.dk > -----Original Message----- > From: Guillaume Nodet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 5. november 2008 22:13 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving Camel to TLP ? > > I think Camel has a good and diverse self sustaining community and > that it should aim to be a TLP now. > Being a subproject of ActiveMQ is no more relevant imho. > So I'd like to start writing a proposal that would be submitted to the board. > We would have to come with a project charter, decide what the PMC list > will be and find a PMC chair. > Help and feedback welcomed ! > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
