On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Manuel Teira Paz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello again. > > Actually, we need both sides of the socket to get full at nearly the same > time for the deadlock to occur. But the posibility is there.
This is a common problem that has been taken care of in the ActiveMQ trunk (which will be ActiveMQ 5.2) via the following issue and the patches attached to it: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1993 We're currently testing these patches as part of ActiveMQ 5.2 RC4 (the third release candidate for the 5.2) and voting on it. Please download it to test it out in your environment and give us your feedback. Here's the email about the release candidate and where to get it: http://markmail.org/search/?q=activemq+5.2.0+rc3#query:activemq%205.2.0%20rc3+page:1+mid:6unahrpbm5yegs6i+state:results Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );' Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/ Apache Camel - http://activemq.org/camel/ Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/ Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
