[ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=47301#action_47301
 ] 

Alexander Martens commented on AMQCPP-199:
------------------------------------------

You got me!

Yes, I was running a 5.3 snapshot and I forgot to disable persistence at the 
broker. Sorry again.
I'll schedule another run for tonight with a dozen stress-tests (each one with 
its own 100 tries) and a server restart in between.
Following AMQCPP-202, I'll revert to APR 1.3.4 in debug mode, and 5.1 for the 
server.

I find pretty significant it didn't crash, though.

Will update this thread tomorrow.


> Segmentation fault at decaf/net/SocketInputStream.cpp (line 108)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQCPP-199
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-199
>             Project: ActiveMQ C++ Client
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Decaf, Openwire
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.1
>         Environment: RHEL 5.2 (32 bits), apr-1.3.3, apr-util-1.3.4, ActiveMQ 
> 5.1, gcc 4.1.2-42 (20071124), Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 
> 1.6.0_06-b02), pyactivemq-0.1.0rc1
>            Reporter: Alexander Martens
>            Assignee: Timothy Bish
>             Fix For: 2.2.2
>
>         Attachments: python.stress.log.gz, stress-fc8.log.gz, stress.out
>
>
> We're getting occasional segmentation faults in our Python based application.
> The easiest way to reproduce it is by running pyactivemq's stress tests 
> (src/tests/stresstest.py).
> The offending line seems to be always the same.
> I send you attached a full gdb postmortem back-trace.
> Any help will be appreciated!

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to