[ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rob Davies resolved AMQ-1939.
-----------------------------

    Resolution: Cannot Reproduce

Please produce a TEST CASE - can't reproduce this

> AMQ broker does not honour consumer priority setting on queue
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-1939
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1939
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 5.1.0
>         Environment: WinXP, SLES9, WinNT4
>            Reporter: Bonny Rais
>            Assignee: Rob Davies
>            Priority: Blocker
>
> We have a simple setup where an AMQ broker is connected to from one producer 
> and two consumers. The producer tends to be colocated on the broker's host so 
> comms is never an issue there. However, consumers can come and go because the 
> underlying comms may not be reliable.
> The consumers are connected with differing priorities so that the broker 
> directs all messages to a single consumer normally and switches over to the 
> other consumer when the primary consumer disconnects for whatever reason.
> This arrangement seems to work fine most of the time, but sometimes (and we 
> cannot identify the cause), upon a comms error
> or a consumer error (that may mean messages are not acknowledged within some 
> time period), the broker switches over to the 
> secondary consumer. That in itself if good, of course. However, when the 
> primary consumer reconnects back to the queue as 
> primary, messages are not being delivered to it at all - the only way to fix 
> this seems to be to restart the broker.
> We cannot even force the broker to drop the connections (we're limited in the 
> way we can use jconsole with those brokers, particularly with the WinNT ones).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to