Any other thoughts out there? On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Hiram Chirino <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi Guys, > > So while working on the ActiveMQ flow module which I hope one day will > be come ActiveMQ 6, I realized that I'm going to need a new package > name space to hold all the new bits to avoid clashing with the 5.x > classes in cases where users have both products in the same classpath. > I decided to use 'org.apache.activemq.apollo' for now. > This is similar to what the Tomcat project when through when they > developed the catalina based tomcat engine. So, just to avoid a bit > package refactor in the future, I'd like your input what you think > would be a good code name for the ActiveMQ 6 code base? Lets try to > keep it concise as it will be used in package names. > > My favorites so far would be: > apollo > puma > > -- > Regards, > Hiram > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com > > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com/ > -- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com/
