On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Rob Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com> wrote: > I attempt weeding every few months - trouble is - its a jungle ;)
Agreed, which is why I'm trying to get everyone to look at a few. Then we can move on to the 5.4.0 issues using the same scrutiny. > A lot of > the unresolved issues will take a lot of time to validate - as they do have > steps to reproduce - but they aren't junit tests HIram and I talked about that briefly. We agreed that we need to be more strict about this. Hiram is in favor of kicking any issue that doesn't have a test. I wouldn't go that far, my threshold is a requirement of steps to reproduce. So if neither of those are available, and the issue seems sufficiently unclear, just kick it. > Can you make the filter public btw ? I can't see it Sorry about that, it's now shared. Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)u8...@4vyy9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );' ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ Blog: http://bruceblog.org/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder