[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rob Davies updated AMQ-2596:
----------------------------
Fix Version/s: 5.3.1
> Memory leak in network of brokers - the number of ConsumerInfo objects
> increases
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-2596
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2596
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Broker
> Affects Versions: 4.1.1, 5.3.0
> Environment: OS: SLES10 SP2 or Ubuntu 9.10 (my desktop)
> JVM: IBM J9 VM (build 2.3, J2RE 1.5.0 IBM J9 2.3 Linux x86-32
> j9vmxi3223-20081129 (JIT enabled)
> Reporter: Mark Wuwer
> Assignee: Rob Davies
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 5.3.1, 5.4.0
>
> Attachments: be_activemq.xml, fe_activemq.xml,
> MemLeakSuspectNetworkOfBrokersTest.java
>
>
> I'd like to report a reproducible memory leak in network of brokers.
> This is the scenario you can reproduce it (tried out with 4.1.1, 5.3.0 and
> 5.3.1):
> 1. start two brokers using attached configuration.
> Lets call one of it BE (for backend) another FE (for frontend) -
> accordingly: be_activemq.xml and fe_activemq.xml are attached.
> The BE broker contains following configuration:
> <transportConnectors>
> <transportConnector name="openwire" uri="tcp://0.0.0.0:61616"/>
> </transportConnectors>
> <networkConnectors>
> <networkConnector name="FE_connector" dynamicOnly="true"
> uri="static://(tcp://localhost:61617)"/>
> </networkConnectors>
> The FE broker contains just:
> <transportConnectors>
> <transportConnector name="openwire" uri="tcp://0.0.0.0:61617"/>
> </transportConnectors>
> 2. now start a client that opens and close permanently topic subscriptions
> (see attached tests)
> to the FE broker
> 3. after a while you will see (e.g. verbose gc) that the heap usage of the BE
> broker will increase,
> but on FE not
> If you analyze the heap dump of BE you will see that the memory leak consist
> of a large number of ConsumerInfo
> objects. Easy way to find the objects when you use MAT is to use the OQL
> query e.g.:
> SELECT c.destination.physicalName.toString() FROM ".*ConsumerInfo" c
> WHERE (c.destination.physicalName.toString() LIKE "TEST_TOPIC")
> I noticed that basically for each subscription on FE two ConsumerInfo objects
> are created on BE, which will never be closed.
> There are however some special cases that only 4, 8 .. 12 objects per
> connection are created. This happens when the client just opens
> sessions/subscriptions without closing (see appropriate junit test with
> comments in it).
> We have it currently a P1 ticket at our customer site (running 3*FE + BE
> using 4.1.1) because of OoM that occurs periodically (in fact we now restart
> every n-days the system).
> Another strange issue that happens at our customer site is something that I
> cannot reproduce at all.
> The ConsumerInfo objects on BE contains there non empty selector strings,
> which makes the memory leak more critical.
> In my test environment however selector strings are only set in ConsumerInfo
> on FE, but in BE broker the selectorin ConsumerInfo is always null!
> I compared the customer configuration with my and I could not find any
> difference.
> Any idea what could influence this behavior?
> Thanks in advance for any feedback and help on this issue.
> Best Regards,
> Mark
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
