[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Brad Willard updated AMQ-2745:
------------------------------
Affects Version/s: 5.4.0
Confirmed this is still an issue in the 5.4 snapshot
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.4-SNAPSHOT/apache-activemq-5.4-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
> Deadlock or Performance Bottleneck when reading messages with Correlation
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-2745
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2745
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Broker
> Affects Versions: 5.3.1, 5.3.2, 5.4.0
> Environment: Java 64-bit, Windows 2008 Server, Centos 5 64bit,
> Ubuntu 110 64-bit
> Reporter: Brad Willard
> Attachments: activemq.xml, PutMessages.java, ReadMessages.java
>
>
> We have a situation where we are posting messages to a queue with two
> different correlation ids specifically intended to reach two different
> clients who subscribe with message selectors for the appropriate correlation.
> The clients are reading with message listeners. When one client stops
> reading the expected behavior, and the behavior we saw on 5.3.0, is that the
> messages with the correlation for the stopped client will backup on the queue
> and will not effect the performance of the second client who is still reading
> the messages with the other correlation. With our memory config messages can
> backup into the hundreds of thousands before noticing any performance impact
> on the active client.
> However this is not the case in 5.3.1 or 5.3.2. With 5.3.1 once enough
> messages backup for the stopped client, suddenly the active client's
> performance drops drastically 20 ms reads to 30,000ms reads. We will see
> this within a few hundred messages. I believe there is some kind of
> deadlock, or buffering bottleneck that was introduced on the client side.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
