Thanks for creating that test! I think the ActiveMQ server configuration is necessary if it requires anything special to reproduce, otherwise, just mention that the server has a standard configuration. Also include any URI parameter options necessary for the client.
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:44 PM, magellings <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have an NUnit unit test which proves message loss with a durable > subscriber > when using version 1.4.1 with ActiveMQ version 5.4.1. > > The same unit tests passes when using NMS v1.1.0. > > The message loss occurs when the master broker fails over to the slave > broker. > > Like I said I have the unit test, but what else should I all include when I > create an issue for this? ActiveMQ configuration? Anything else that > could > help with troubleshooting the issue? > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Apache-NMS-ActiveMQ-v1-4-1-and-Durable-Subscription-message-loss-tp3058202p3058202.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
