The InactivityMonitor onException call interrupts itself when the readCheckTime 
was exceeded.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: AMQ-3567
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3567
             Project: ActiveMQ
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: JMS client
    Affects Versions: 5.5.1, 5.5.0
            Reporter: Claudio Corsi
            Priority: Trivial
             Fix For: 5.6.0, 5.5.1, 5.5.0


The process that activemq uses to check if there has been inactivity for a 
connection has a flaw when it tries to close the connection because of 
inactivity. The current process generates the following interrupt exception. 

{code} 
2011-10-25 12:13:56,878 | DEBUG | org.apache.activemq.util.ServiceSupport - 
Could not stop service: tcp://localhost/127.0.0.1:61616. Reason: 
java.lang.InterruptedException
java.lang.InterruptedException
    at 
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.tryAcquireSharedNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1302)
    at java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch.await(CountDownLatch.java:253)
    at 
org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.doStop(TcpTransport.java:553)
    at org.apache.activemq.util.ServiceSupport.stop(ServiceSupport.java:70)
    at 
org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.stop(TcpTransport.java:570)
    at 
org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor.stop(InactivityMonitor.java:132)
    at 
org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.stop(TransportFilter.java:65)
    at 
org.apache.activemq.transport.WireFormatNegotiator.stop(WireFormatNegotiator.java:91)
    at org.apache.activemq.util.ServiceSupport.dispose(ServiceSupport.java:43)
    at 
org.apache.activemq.transport.failover.FailoverTransport.disposeTransport(FailoverTransport.java:207)
    at 
org.apache.activemq.transport.failover.FailoverTransport.handleTransportFailure(FailoverTransport.java:223)
    at 
org.apache.activemq.transport.failover.FailoverTransport$3.onException(FailoverTransport.java:184)
    at 
org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.onException(TransportFilter.java:101)
    at 
org.apache.activemq.transport.WireFormatNegotiator.onException(WireFormatNegotiator.java:160)
    at 
org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor.onException(InactivityMonitor.java:265)
    at 
org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor$4.run(InactivityMonitor.java:185)
    at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
    at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680)
{code} 

This is caused because the spawned thread in the AbstractInactivityMonitor 
classes readCheck method calls the onException method. This method will then 
call the stopMonitorThreads method which subsequently calls the shutdownNow 
method of the ASYNC_TASKS executor. This call causes the executor to call the 
interrupt method for all active threads in the executor. The problem is that 
the calling thread is part of the ASYNC_TASKS executor and therefore it is 
generating the interrupt exception. 

Here is the stack trace of the call that is causing the interrupt. 

{code} 
Daemon Thread [InactivityMonitor Async Task: 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker@66da9ea4] (Suspended (entry into 
method interrupt in Thread))   
    Thread.interrupt() line: 902   
    ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.interruptNow() line: 855   
    ThreadPoolExecutor.shutdownNow() line: 1167   
    InactivityMonitor.stopMonitorThreads() line: 363   
    InactivityMonitor.onException(IOException) line: 264   
    InactivityMonitor$4.run() line: 185   
    ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(Runnable) line: 886   
    ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run() line: 908   
    Thread.run() line: 680  
{code} 


The solution is to replace the shutdownNow method call with shutdown. 
Subsequent testing with this change does not cause the interrupt exception. 

I was able to create a testcase that reproduces this issue. The testcase uses 
the useInactivityMonitor=false attribute to reproduce this issue, thanks Gary 
for the hint. Unfortunately there aren't any steps that I can use to determine 
that the raised interrupted exception was raised or not. The test will pass 
either way. 

A patch will be added to this issue.




--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to