[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13153503#comment-13153503
 ] 

Eric Hubert commented on AMQ-3597:
----------------------------------

I now worked through AM-1853 and see that this one was actually about making 
the consumer behavior during redeliveries configurable (blocking versus 
non-blocking) which is indeed an expected configuration option. But this will 
be available only once 5.6 is released.

Personally in addition to this configuration option I had expected another 
configuration option for the end user to decide at which place the redelivery 
process is initiated/controlled (broker versus consumer) as the use cases may 
predetermine the more suitable approach. Using Camel as described in AMQ-2710 
can be either seen as a workaround for the solution implemented in AMQ-1853 or 
as a workaround for a missing "native" support for broker-based 
redelivery/redispatch.

Last but no least I also have to agree that the theoretical workaround I 
described under my initial option b) to somehow circumvent the missing 
broker-side delay in letting the consumer perform the delay would be indeed an 
odd counter-intuitive mixture of broker and consumer controlled redelivery and 
only a result of neither getting the one nor the other approach to work.
                
> Enable RedeliveryPolicy to determine next delay independent of the consumer
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-3597
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3597
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 5.5.1
>            Reporter: Eric Hubert
>            Assignee: Timothy Bish
>             Fix For: 5.6.0
>
>
> Currently the redelivery is bound to the consumer instance requiring the end 
> user to use the same message consumer instance. This is due to the fact that 
> the redelivery delay is computated based on the previous redelivery delay 
> (stored with the consumer instance) and not based on the redeliveryCount of 
> the message.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to