Unexpected behavior in FailoverTransport when hosts are unknown
---------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: AMQ-3673
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3673
             Project: ActiveMQ
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: JMS client
    Affects Versions: 5.5.0
         Environment: MacOS X 10.5
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_26-b03-384-10M3425)
            Reporter: Stefan Riesen
            Priority: Minor


There's an unexpected behavior when a failover url is specified where the first 
host does not exist, e.g.

failover:(tcp://nonexistinghost.mydomain.com:61616,tcp://existinghost.mydomain.com:61616)?randomize=false

The failover code will never switch to the 
tcp://existinghost.mydomain.com:61616 while when using this url:

failover:(tcp://nonexistinghost.mydomain.com:61617,tcp://existinghost.mydomain.com:61616)?randomize=false

The failover works flawlessly. I tracket the problem down to the method 
org.apache.activemq.transport.failover.FailoverTransport.contains(URI):

private boolean contains(URI newURI) {

        boolean result = false;
        try {
        for (URI uri:uris) {
            if (newURI.getPort()==uri.getPort()) {
                InetAddress newAddr = InetAddress.getByName(newURI.getHost());
                InetAddress addr = InetAddress.getByName(uri.getHost());
                if (addr.equals(newAddr)) {
                    result = true;
                    break;
                }
            }
        }
        }catch(IOException e) {
            result = true;
            LOG.error("Failed to verify URI " + newURI + " already known: " + 
e);
        }
        return result;
    }

That only resolves hostnames if the ports are not equal (this is why the 
different port behavior comes from).

In above mentioned case in the second call to this method this line fails with 
a UnknownHostException: 

InetAddress addr = InetAddress.getByName(uri.getHost());

and the result of contains() is set to true because of the catch block, 
therefore the second URL isn't added to the list of urls.

I suggest to change the catch block to return false. In case of an IOException 
during the check it's hard to say whether the URIs are the same or not, but 
it's more likely that they're not the same as in this case. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to