I know none of them are really that big but would be good to have a great initial user experience so +1 to re-cut 1.0
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 09:34 -0500, Hiram Chirino wrote: > After the Apollo 1.0 RC has been cut the following issues have been > reported against it: > > * APLO-136 - Broker complains when a dot is used in a dsub name > * APLO-138 - examples: java readme instructions are incorrect > * APLO-137 - usability: apollo script should echo usage when called with no > arguments > > While I don't think any of the above issues are major enough to block a > release, since this is the first 1.0 release, I think perhaps we should > recut the release candidate to bring in the fixes for APLO-137 and APLO-138 > since those affect the initial user experience. > > What do you guys think? >
