+0 I'm neutral on this one. No strong feelings either way, unless there was a show-stopper bug fixed in the core product (not counting the XSS problem in the demos).
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Gaurav Sharma <gaurav.cs.sha...@gmail.com>wrote: > +1 > > We might also consider rolling any patches for the lease db locker. When I > had tested the original patch against oracle, it was working okay but folks > are now reporting that the functionality is broken in 5.7 > > On Oct 22, 2012, at 6:01, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi > > > > Yes I know we recently did a 5.7.0 release. However since we got some > > bug fixes, and also there were some files missing in the binary kits > > that has since been fixed. > > > > As one of the goals for 5.8.0 is to reduce the activemq-core and move > > stuff to separate transports / stores / spring-xbean etc. > > > > I wonder if we should consider cutting a 5.7.1 before we start on > > these goals mentioned above for real. Then the community has this > > stable release with those bug fixes. > > > > And one of the fixes I would like to get in the 5.7.1 would also to > > consider making it more secure out of the box. Eg the mail I posted > > today about not including the samples out of the box, when starting > > the broker. > > > > Just a though. > > > > > > > > -- > > Claus Ibsen > > ----------------- > > Red Hat, Inc. > > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > > Email: cib...@redhat.com > > Web: http://fusesource.com > > Twitter: davsclaus > > Blog: http://davsclaus.com > > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen >
