[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rob Waite updated AMQNET-409:
-----------------------------

    Attachment: Tracer.cs

Attempt to catch *Format() call exceptions in Tracer. If s_trace.Fatal(string 
x) throws... this will still escape.
                
> Failover fails under load. Client goes into reconnect loop.
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQNET-409
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-409
>             Project: ActiveMQ .Net
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ActiveMQ
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.6
>         Environment: Should not matter. AMQ is on Linux, Client is on Windows 
> with .NET 4
>            Reporter: Rob Waite
>            Assignee: Jim Gomes
>         Attachments: Tracer.cs
>
>
> We were testing failover under heavy load. We have a queue that I placed 500k 
> messages in. I then have 5 consumers pulling them as fast as they can. The 
> operations are noops essentially... so messages are consumed in our case at 
> around 500 messages per second with our prod servers.
> I would bring up the consumers and they would be consuming away. I would then 
> "kill -9" AMQ and then observe the client. From the AMQ web admin... they 
> would come back but you would see the 5 consumers go back and forth between 5 
> and 0 and comsumption went down from 500/s to about 3/s.
> Looking at AMQ logs... there was a series of errors like this " Async error 
> occurred: javax.jms.JMSException: Unmatched acknowledge: MessageAck" and then 
> there would be a couple variations of exceptions regarding the connection 
> being lost (EOFException, broken pipe, etc). There would be an endless loop 
> creating this pattern.. a message about an unmatched ack... a message about a 
> socket dying... then reconnection from the client... on and on.
> I can provide the full stack traces but I have already found the line that 
> seems to cause the client to reconnect, fail, disconnect ad infinitum.
> In our particular case... there is a line in the NMS.ActiveMQ source in 
> Connection.cs line 950 (in Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ-1.5.6-src) that looks like:
> {code:title=Connection.cs|borderStyle=solid}
> Tracer.DebugFormat("Connection[{0}]: Async exception with no exception 
> listener: " + error, this.ConnectionId);
> {code}
> The "error" variable was populated with:
> {noformat} 
> "Apache.NMS.NMSConnectionException: Unmatched acknowledge: MessageAck 
> {commandId = 1146, responseRequired = false, ackType = 2, consumerId = 
> ID:kcccccc-54512-634956893773509011-1:10:3:1, firstMessageId = 
> ID:qaaaaa-54879-634956774946428300-1:0:1:2:60645, lastMessageId = 
> ID:qaaaaaa-ops01-54879-634956774946428300-1:0:1:2:60645, destination = 
> queue://AAA.RwwTest.Failover, transactionId = null, messageCount = 1, 
> poisonCause = null}; Could not find Message-ID 
> ID:qaaaaaa-ops01-54879-634956774946428300-1:0:1:2:60645 in dispatched-list 
> (start of ack)"
> {noformat} 
> Notice that there are curly braces in there... when you try to concat this 
> with the first parameter in the Tracer.DebugFormat call you get a 
> System.FormatException with the message "Input string was not in a correct 
> format."
> Changing the line to the following seemed to fix the particular case we were 
> seeing.. but I imagine other use cases may cause the same:
> {code:title=Connection.cs|borderStyle=solid}
> Tracer.DebugFormat("Connection[{0}]: Async exception with no exception 
> listener: {1}", this.ConnectionId, error);
> {code}
> It seems odd that String.Format style logging is used but a string is still 
> concatenated. This seems to happen many places in the code. I would think 
> that either the Tracer should handle this exception or trim illegal 
> characters or DebugFormat should not use concatenation for the first param.
> I have not dug incredibly deeply into the source... but I imagine when an 
> exception was thrown by the log call... it bubbled up and pissed something 
> off. The connection seems to have been closed by the client... but it did not 
> remove state from the previous attempt. When it reconnected, the same 
> occurred and then there was the looping effect.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to