Hi Hiram,

I can help answer the trademark issue.

You aren't supposed to use ® unless the trademark is officially registered with 
the USPTO.  According the the USPTO, it was owned by LogicBlaze, but the 
trademark was never renewed and its considered "Dead", which means its up for 
grabs.  If you want to get it officially registered, you may reclaim it and its 
a 10 week to 6 month process.  The cost is about $300 if you do it pro-se, but 
you need to have your ducks in a row if you do it without a lawyer.  You can 
use ™ since it means its an unregistered trademark and Apache certainly owns it 
via common law.

IANAL (obviously), but I went through some of this last year in securing a 
trademark for my company.  It ended up costing me about $350.00 pro-se (had to 
pay $50 fee because I missed a thing or two from a legal perspective and had to 
refile).

Jeff


On Apr 10, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Hiram Chirino <[email protected]> wrote:

> TLP Description:
> 
> Apache ActiveMQ is a popular and powerful open source messaging server. 
> Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, 
> comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced 
> features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4.
> 
> Community:
>  * The development and user lists continue to stay active.
> 
> Development:
>  * Migration to svnpubsub was completed.
>  * Development on ActiveMQ 5.9 is underway
>  
> Trademark / Branding Status:
> 
>  * The activemq.org and activemq.com TLD's are owned by other entities
>  * Need to investiate if we should be using (R) instead of (TM) for the 
> ActiveMQ mark
>  * Sub-projects need to be reviewed to make sure they are also compliant
>  * Documentation and readme files will also be reviewed for compliance
> 
> Releases:
> 
> * Apache ActiveMQ-CPP 3.6.0 (Mar 7/2013)
> * Apache Apollo 1.6 (Feb 25/2013)
> * Apache ActiveMQ 5.8.0 (Feb 11/2013)
> 
> -- 
> 
> Hiram Chirino
> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> [email protected] | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
> 

Reply via email to