[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Tim Boemker updated AMQ-4564:
-----------------------------

    Description: 
When configured to use a separate database for locking, ActiveMQ Cleanup Timer 
notices that UPDATE ACTIVEMQ_LOCK SET TIME = ... WHERE ID = ... touches no rows 
and stops the broker.

I noticed that there is a table named ACTIVEMQ_LOCK in the main database, and 
that table has a row in it.  When I copied that row to the instance of 
ACTIVEMQ_LOCK in the database used for locking, ActiveMQ ran fine.

ActiveMQ apparently started to initialize ACTIVEMQ_LOCK before it realized that 
it was supposed to use a separate data source for locking.



  was:
When configured to use a separate database for locking, ActiveMQ Cleanup Timer 
notices that UPDATE ACTIVEMQ_LOCK SET TIME = ... WHERE ID = ... touches no rows 
and stops the broker.

I noticed that thee is a table named ACTIVEMQ_LOCK in the main database, and 
that table has a row in it.  When I copied that row to the instance of 
ACTIVEMQ_LOCK in the database used for locking, ActiveMQ ran fine.

ActiveMQ apparently started to initialize ACTIVEMQ_LOCK before it realized that 
it was supposed to use a separate data source for locking.



    
> ActiveMQ fails to hold lock because ACTIVEMQ_LOCK is missing a row
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-4564
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4564
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 5.5.1
>            Reporter: Tim Boemker
>            Priority: Minor
>
> When configured to use a separate database for locking, ActiveMQ Cleanup 
> Timer notices that UPDATE ACTIVEMQ_LOCK SET TIME = ... WHERE ID = ... touches 
> no rows and stops the broker.
> I noticed that there is a table named ACTIVEMQ_LOCK in the main database, and 
> that table has a row in it.  When I copied that row to the instance of 
> ACTIVEMQ_LOCK in the database used for locking, ActiveMQ ran fine.
> ActiveMQ apparently started to initialize ACTIVEMQ_LOCK before it realized 
> that it was supposed to use a separate data source for locking.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to