[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13673550#comment-13673550
]
Tim Boemker commented on AMQ-4564:
----------------------------------
I can't say for sure, and my test environment is shared, so I'm not able to
test with 5.8.0 now.
> ActiveMQ creates & initializes ACTIVEMQ_LOCK in wrong database when using
> separate lock data source
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-4564
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4564
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 5.5.1
> Reporter: Tim Boemker
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: activemq.log, broker-config.xml
>
>
> When configured to use a secondary database for locking, ActiveMQ creates and
> initializes ACTIVEMQ_LOCK in the primary database. It then starts as slave
> because it can't lock the table in the secondary database.
> Workaround: manually copy the ACTIVEMQ_LOCK table from the primary database
> to the secondary database.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
