[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gary Tully resolved AMQ-4347.
-----------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
peeked at this, and I am not sure it is worth introducing new variables to the
lease locker.
If the 'lock' term is replaced with a 'lease' term I think they make some
sense. granted the names reflect more the implementation rather than the intent
which is not ideal but the implementation is shared with all lockers so there
is some consistency.
> Rename lockKeepAlivePeriod and lockAcquireSleepInterval for more intuition
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-4347
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4347
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Message Store
> Affects Versions: 5.7.0, 5.8.0
> Reporter: SuoNayi
> Assignee: Gary Tully
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.9.0
>
>
> For lease database locker the lockKeepAlivePeriod property is the peroid to
> renew the lease and lockAcquireSleepInterval is the amount for lease
> extension.Renaming them to leaseRenewPeroid and leaseDuration respectively
> brings more intuition and readability.
> Besides, leaseDuration should be greater than leaseRenewPeroid to avoid
> unnecessary master/slave switching.
> The users should be aware of unproper configuration via warning log.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
