Gary Tully created AMQ-4791:
-------------------------------
Summary: [org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection] dispatch paused,
waiting for outstanding dispatch interruption processing (1) to complete..
Key: AMQ-4791
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4791
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Transport
Affects Versions: 5.8.0
Reporter: Gary Tully
Assignee: Gary Tully
Fix For: 5.9.0
Race condition between consumer close and transport calculation of outstanding
interruption processing. Transport thinks there are more responses required
before allowing dispatch due to a mis count of active consumers.
NOTE: This is issue was initially reported using the Spring DMLC with the AMQ
rar deployed in a J2EE container. However it can be replicated the issue with a
simple JMS client creating a new consumer and closing the consumer for every
call to consumer.receive(1000).
The client AMQ connection appears to stop dispatching messages to the consumer
and continuously logs the following message
WARN [org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection] (ActiveMQ Transport:
tcp://localhost/127.0.0.1:61616@51487) dispatch paused, waiting for outstanding
dispatch interruption processing (1) to complete..
Thread appears to remain in following state {code}
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(boolean, long) @bci=0 (Compiled frame; information may
be imprecise)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(java.lang.Object, long)
@bci=20, line=226 (Compiled frame)
-
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireSharedNanos(int,
long) @bci=122, line=1033 (Interpreted frame)
-
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.tryAcquireSharedNanos(int,
long) @bci=25, line=1326 (Compiled frame)
- java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch.await(long,
java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit) @bci=10, line=282 (Compiled frame)
-
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.waitForTransportInterruptionProcessingToComplete()
@bci=82, line=2455 (Compiled frame)
-
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection$3.processMessageDispatch(org.apache.activemq.command.MessageDispatch)
@bci=4, line=1841 (Compiled frame)
-
org.apache.activemq.command.MessageDispatch.visit(org.apache.activemq.state.CommandVisitor)
@bci=2, line=113 (Compiled frame)
- org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.onCommand(java.lang.Object) @bci=29,
line=1838 (Compiled frame)
- org.apache.activemq.transport.ResponseCorrelator.onCommand(java.lang.Object)
@bci=172, line=116 (Compiled frame)
- org.apache.activemq.transport.MutexTransport.onCommand(java.lang.Object)
@bci=52, line=50 (Compiled frame)
-
org.apache.activemq.transport.failover.FailoverTransport$3.onCommand(java.lang.Object)
@bci=148, line=203 (Compiled frame)
-
org.apache.activemq.transport.WireFormatNegotiator.onCommand(java.lang.Object)
@bci=29, line=113 (Compiled frame)
-
org.apache.activemq.transport.AbstractInactivityMonitor.onCommand(java.lang.Object)
@bci=156, line=288 (Compiled frame)
- org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportSupport.doConsume(java.lang.Object)
@bci=16, line=83 (Compiled frame)
- org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.doRun() @bci=7, line=214
(Compiled frame)
- org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.run() @bci=47, line=196
(Compiled frame)
- java.lang.Thread.run() @bci=11, line=722 (Interpreted frame) {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)