Cool! I was looking at it originally myself, but I'm not sure if I understand all consequences. Is there anything else to be aware of besides the split-brain scenario?
Cheers, Jaromir On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Hiram Chirino <[email protected]>wrote: > Ok sounds like a plan. :) > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Jaromir Hamala <[email protected]> > wrote: > > There is nothing really fancy: > > > http://www.hazelcast.com/docs/3.0/manual/multi_html/ch12s02.html#NetworkPartitioning > > I believe there is no way how to specify a minimum quorum in order to > > obtain a distributed lock. This could lead to a situation where 2 servers > > will act as masters during the split-brain scenario, however I believe it > > should be possible to implement this in ActiveMQ code - something like > > > > if (currentClusterSize < minimumSize) { dontEvenTryBeObtainAMasterLock.. > } > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Hiram Chirino <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> Would love to have multiple options. My biggest question is how does > >> Hazelcast deal with network splits? > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Jaromir Hamala < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > Hi guys, > >> > > >> > I was looking at the implementation of replicated LevelDB store. It > >> > currently requires Apache ZooKeeper. I was thinking how to simplify it > >> and > >> > it seems me it should be possible to implement both electing master > and > >> > member discovery mechanisms by Hazelcast. > >> > > >> > What do you think about it? Hazelcast implements distributed locking, > >> it's > >> > very easy to use and has no external dependencies. I'm hoping to > simplify > >> > deployment and easy to use of ActiveMQ HA capabilities. > >> > > >> > Cheers, > >> > Jaromir > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > “Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but > when > >> > there is nothing left to take away.” > >> > Antoine de Saint Exupéry > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Hiram Chirino > >> > >> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. > >> > >> [email protected] | fusesource.com | redhat.com > >> > >> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino > >> > >> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > “Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when > > there is nothing left to take away.” > > Antoine de Saint Exupéry > > > > -- > Hiram Chirino > > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. > > [email protected] | fusesource.com | redhat.com > > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino > > blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo > -- “Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.” Antoine de Saint Exupéry
