[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13872695#comment-13872695
]
Gary Tully commented on AMQ-4365:
---------------------------------
@Paul - i think it will. The unavailable at startup case is not validated in
any test but the lease acquire should continue to retry on start.
the offline at runtime is validated via:
org.apache.activemq.broker.ft.DbRestartJDBCQueueMasterSlaveLeaseTest
> Allow the Lease Locker to be used with out a JDBCPersistenceAdapter - so it
> can be a kahadb lock
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-4365
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4365
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 5.8.0
> Reporter: Gary Tully
> Assignee: Gary Tully
> Fix For: 5.9.0
>
>
> The locker interface needs another configure option to provide a broker
> service, or needs to be brokerService aware so that a locker can get identity
> and access to the io exception handlers.
> The lease database locker is dependent on the jdbc pa to get statements and
> data source. It should be possible to configure these independently such that
> it can be used standalone as a broker lock. So setters for each.
> This will help sort out some of the dependencies between broker and lock
> implementations. also making it possible to use a lease lock with kahadb for
> example.
> some context:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/activemq-users/201303.mbox/%3ccaj5znhuruz+aewsaabajtwbbpkwn06ryyyt6nqsdg_su7vm...@mail.gmail.com%3E
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
