[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13874102#comment-13874102
 ] 

Georgi Danov commented on AMQ-3316:
-----------------------------------

created AMQ-4977

> Memory leak in ConnectionStateTracker with MessagePull objects
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-3316
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3316
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 5.4.2, 5.5.0
>            Reporter: Martin Carpella
>            Assignee: Gary Tully
>             Fix For: 5.6.0
>
>         Attachments: connectionstatetracker_fixed.patch
>
>
> We discovered a memory leak in {{ConnectionStateTracker}} in case a 
> long-lived connection with prefetch=0 is used.
> If prefetch=0 is used, {{MessagePull}} objects are enqueued in 
> {{messageCache}} with an estimated size of 400. But in the cache's 
> {{removeEldestEntry()}} method no size is subtracted from 
> {{currentCacheSize}} for {{MessagePull}} instances. This messes with the 
> cache as it will continue to remove objects even if there is space in the 
> cache. But after about 5,368,709 consumed messages this will cause the 
> {{currentCacheSize}} to roll-over maximum integer and become negative. As a 
> consequence, for the next about 5,368,709 no messages will be removed from 
> the cache any longer.
> This sooner or later will trigger out-of-memory conditions, depending on the 
> size of the various pools. In our case this caused out-of-memory in PermGen 
> first, as message IDs seem to be internalized, and PermGen is considerably 
> smaller than the heap.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to