Hi Rob, I'm glad that's your definition of blatant abuse -- it's not my definition at all.
My definition starts with a PMC that knowingly shipped a big front-facing part of its product that had links all over it to technical documents, youtube videos, company specific information and yet didn't have anything remotely resembling Apache as a first class citizen. So yes, it's more than shipping a web console from another OS Apache License project. You (part of the Apache ActiveMQ PMC) help to ship an Apache endorsed release that didn't respect Apache IMO and got the attention of trademarks and the Apache board. Cheers, Chris -----Original Message----- From: Robert Davies <[email protected]> Reply-To: <[email protected]> Date: Friday, January 31, 2014 11:20 PM To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Move the ActiveMQ web-console to a sub-project. > >> >> the blatant abuse of this >> PMC of Apache brands, > >Abuse of the Apache brands would be calling a product ³Apache ESB² - a >project that doesn¹t exist at the ASF, but trying to get marketing >through association with the Apache brand. >We (ActiveMQ PMC) shipped a web console from another OS Apache Licence >project. Please explain the blatant abuse? > > >Rob Davies > >Red Hat, Inc >http://hawt.io - #dontcha >Twitter: rajdavies >Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com >ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >
