+1. I think we'd still have to do a 5.9.1, but it's a good idea. While I
sort through the issues for 5.9.1 I could cut a 5.10.0-RC1. Or should we
go straight to a 5.10.0 and redo it if necessary?
Hadrian
On 02/03/2014 10:41 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
I think it's safest to to just call trunk 5.10 now since it is taking
away some functionality. Would be nice to get some RCs going soon
since trunk is stable right now.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I am still planning to release 5.9.1. We need to figure out if we want to
cut 5.9.1 off of the current trunk at a stable checkpoint, or branch it off
5.9.0 and just select the relevant patches. While the feedback on this list
is not conclusive (and I personally favor the 1st approach) I believe most
would favor the 2nd approach. Last week there were over 200 patches that
we'd have to look through and backport. The fastest we could get through
this the sooner we'll have the release, I hope before mid Feb.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 01/30/2014 03:31 PM, kal123 wrote:
There were post for cutting 5.9.1 any update on timeline for this?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/activemq-5-9-1-tp4677074.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
