On 05/13/2014 08:25 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
On 13 May 2014 17:59, Justin Ross <jr...@apache.org> wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Gordon Sim <g...@redhat.com> wrote:
How about process_name and process_id then?


I like those.  I don't think brevity is important in this case, and those
names are very clear to me.


Works for me too.

Ok, does anyone object to process_name and process_id?

Reply via email to