Hmm, from the deafening silence I must assume that either of the two things happened: 1. People didn't read my post for some reason (and hence I am replying to my own post to refresh this post), or 2. There is no appetite supporting JMS 2.0 in ActiveMQ and hence people ignored my post.
Anyways, if I won't see any feedback or comments to this post, I have to assume that ActiveMQ will be a "dead-end" with regards to JMS 2.0 (and future versions of JMS). Thanks, -Uli -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Discussion-JMS-2-0-API-support-tp4681089p4681256.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
