+1 Regards -- Dejan Bosanac ---------------------- Red Hat, Inc. [email protected] Twitter: @dejanb Blog: http://sensatic.net ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for java 7 > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 07/08/2014 04:47 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> > >> Has there been a discussion and/or agreement about the Java requirements > >> for 5.11? 5.10 still support Java6. For 5.11, would it make sense to > >> require Java7? > >> > >> I’m mostly asking as I have a pull request coming that updates all the > >> poms and such so that you can pull activemq into eclipse via M2E > instead of > >> the eclipse:eclipse thing. However, there is one small issue around > >> activemq-runtime-config that causes a problem if Eclipse is running with > >> Java7, but the project level is Java6. I *may* be able to work around > it, > >> but it’s not work spending the time if the plan is to update to Java 7 > >> anyway. > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > > +1 for moving to Java7 > > > > -- > > Tim Bish > > Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc. > > [email protected] | www.fusesource.com | www.redhat.com > > skype: tabish121 | twitter: @tabish121 > > blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > ----------------- > Red Hat, Inc. > Email: [email protected] > Twitter: davsclaus > Blog: http://davsclaus.com > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen > hawtio: http://hawt.io/ > fabric8: http://fabric8.io/ >
