[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14117134#comment-14117134
 ] 

Edwin Wang commented on AMQ-5338:
---------------------------------

Bellow is result from Eclipse Memory Analyzer

Problem Suspect 1
One instance of "com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.JmxMBeanServer" loaded by "<system 
class loader>" occupies 182,127,056 (57.45%) bytes. The instance is referenced 
by org.apache.activemq.broker.jmx.ManagementContext @ 0xf142bc0 , loaded by 
"java.net.URLClassLoader @ 0xef3bad0". The memory is accumulated in one 
instance of "java.util.HashMap$Entry[]" loaded by "<system class loader>".

Problem Suspect 2
74,663 instances of "javax.management.ObjectName", loaded by "<system class 
loader>" occupy 62,369,904 (19.67%) bytes. These instances are referenced from 
one instance of "java.lang.Object[]", loaded by "<system class loader>"


Possible Memory Waste
Duplicate Strings
Found 146 occurrences of char[] with at least 10 instances having identical 
content. Total size is 8,593,000 bytes.

Top elements include:
•22 × \u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u... (59,338 bytes)
•4,355 × JMS Client id of the Connection the Producer is on... (120 bytes)
•4,355 × User Name used to authorize creation of this Produ... (120 bytes)
•4,355 × The name of the destionation the Producer is on. (112 bytes)
•4,355 × Is the producer configured for Async Dispatch (104 bytes) 

> Run into Memory Leak problem after upgrade from 5.5.1 to 5.10
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-5338
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5338
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 5.9.0, 5.10.0
>         Environment: Windows 2012 R2,  JDK 1.7.40, CPU I5, Memory 8G
>            Reporter: Edwin Wang
>
> Our production environment has used ActiveMQ 5.5.1 for a long time and it 
> works well. Recently we decided to verify ActiveMQ 5.10 for prepared for 
> upgrade. However, after we upgrade the test environment to 5.10, the MQ is 
> easy ran into out of memory every 7-10 days. 
> In order to compare the two, I use the same environment and same 
> configuration for both 5.5.1 and 5.10.0. Finally, 5.10.0 ran into out of 
> memory while 5.5.1 works well.
> It looks like a bug for 5.10.
> Below is the main part of the configration
> <destinationPolicy>
>             <policyMap>
>               <policyEntries>
>                 <policyEntry topic=">" advisoryForConsumed="false" 
> advisoryForDelivery="false" gcInactiveDestinations="true" 
> inactiveTimoutBeforeGC="600000" producerFlowControl="true" memoryLimit="3mb">
>                   <pendingSubscriberPolicy>
>                     <vmCursor />
>                   </pendingSubscriberPolicy>
>                 </policyEntry>
>                 <policyEntry queue=">" advisoryForConsumed="false" 
> advisoryForDelivery="false" gcInactiveDestinations="true" 
> inactiveTimoutBeforeGC="600000" producerFlowControl="true" memoryLimit="3mb">
>                 </policyEntry>
>               </policyEntries>
>             </policyMap>
>         </destinationPolicy>
> <managementContext>
>             <managementContext createConnector="true"/>
>         </managementContext>
> <plugins>
>                               <simpleAuthenticationPlugin>
>                                       <users>
>                                               <authenticationUser 
> username="msgmanager" password="Br0c@d3s0ft" groups="admins"/>
>                                       </users>
>                               </simpleAuthenticationPlugin>
>                         <authorizationPlugin>
>                               <map>
>                                 <authorizationMap>
>                                       <authorizationEntries>
>                                         <authorizationEntry queue=">" 
> read="admins" write="admins" admin="admins" />
>                                         <authorizationEntry topic=">" 
> read="admins" write="admins" admin="admins" />
>                                       </authorizationEntries>
>                                 </authorizationMap>
>                               </map>
>                         </authorizationPlugin>
>           </plugins>



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to