[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14127117#comment-14127117
]
clebert suconic commented on AMQ-5350:
--------------------------------------
do you still set maxFrameSize on the transport?
I found out that not setting it at all will make performance to be 10X better
due to some issues on Proton. It's a bug on Proton probably and still not fixed.
> Separate the AMQP maxFrameSize setting from the WireFormat maxFrameSize
> setting.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-5350
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5350
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: AMQP
> Affects Versions: 5.10.0
> Reporter: Timothy Bish
> Assignee: Timothy Bish
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.11.0
>
>
> We currently set the maxFrameSize value in Proton using the WireFormat
> maxFrameSize value. This not the correct application of this property as it
> is meant to control the max size a frame we will accept before we disconnect
> a client whereas in AMQP this control how large a frame is before the
> transport starts splitting the data into multiple frames.
> Setting this value on Proton has other side effects like increased memory
> utilization and decreased performance. Instead of linking these we should
> introduce an additional property on the AMQP WireFormat class to allow for
> setting the maxAmqpFrameSize which defaults to no max.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
