That's great stuff you're doing...
Is there a branch we could try this? Perhaps there are dependencies that would need to be installed, and old dependencies we still need to clear from the codebase? Did you look at that? On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 11:23 AM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm resending this as I had my emails messed up. Sorry for any moderation > issues. > > On Sat Jan 03 2015 at 11:06:43 AM John D. Ament <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Ok, so got a little bit further. I see the broker starting with the in vm >> connector. >> >> 659 [main] DEBUG org.apache.activemq.ra - Recovery Registry located = >> org.apache.activemq.service.extensions.xa.recovery.ActiveMQRegistryImpl@a530d0a >> >> 660 [main] DEBUG org.apache.activemq.ra - No connector params provided >> using default >> >> 660 [main] DEBUG org.apache.activemq.ra - Creating Connection Factory on >> the resource adapter for >> transport=[TransportConfiguration(name=8a3b9a30-9361-11e4-8f47-bb448fce34db, >> factory=org-apache-activemq-core-remoting-impl-invm-InVMConnectorFactory) >> ?server-id=0] with ha=false >> >> 660 [main] DEBUG org.apache.activemq.ra - No connector params provided >> using default >> >> 660 [main] DEBUG org.apache.activemq.ra - Creating Recovery Connection >> Factory on the resource adapter for >> transport=[TransportConfiguration(name=8a3b9a32-9361-11e4-8f47-bb448fce34db, >> factory=org-apache-activemq-core-remoting-impl-invm-InVMConnectorFactory) >> ?server-id=0] >> >> 660 [main] DEBUG org.apache.activemq.ra - registering recovery for >> factory : ActiveMQConnectionFactory [serverLocator=ServerLocatorImpl >> [initialConnectors=[TransportConfiguration(name=8a3b9a32-9361-11e4-8f47-bb448fce34db, >> factory=org-apache-activemq-core-remoting-impl-invm-InVMConnectorFactory) >> ?server-id=0], discoveryGroupConfiguration=null], clientID=null, >> consumerWindowSize = 1048576, dupsOKBatchSize=1048576, >> transactionBatchSize=1048576, readOnly=false] >> >> 660 [main] INFO org.apache.activemq.ra - ActiveMQ resource adaptor started >> >> >> However, it looks like on connecting it fails. I see this log message 10 >> times >> >> >> 743 [amq-worker- - 1] DEBUG org.apache.activemq.core.client - Trying >> reconnection attempt 0/1 >> >> 743 [amq-worker- - 1] DEBUG org.apache.activemq.core.client - Trying to >> connect with connector = >> org.apache.activemq.core.remoting.impl.invm.InVMConnectorFactory@6968dc8d, >> parameters = {server-id=0} connector = null >> >> 743 [amq-worker- - 1] DEBUG org.apache.activemq.core.client - Connector >> towards org.apache.activemq.core.remoting.impl.invm.InVMConnector@51aed0b7 >> failed >> >> >> with different factories and connectors. Finally the stack trace on >> failure ends up looking like this: >> >> javax.jms.JMSException: Failed to create session factory >> >> at >> org.apache.activemq.core.client.impl.ServerLocatorImpl.createSessionFactory(ServerLocatorImpl.java:928) >> >> at >> org.apache.activemq.jms.client.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createConnectionInternal(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:673) >> >> at >> org.apache.activemq.jms.client.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createXAConnection(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:209) >> >> at >> org.apache.activemq.jms.client.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createXAConnection(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:204) >> >> at >> org.apache.activemq.ra.ActiveMQRAManagedConnection.setup(ActiveMQRAManagedConnection.java:906) >> >> at >> org.apache.activemq.ra.ActiveMQRAManagedConnection.<init>(ActiveMQRAManagedConnection.java:170) >> >> at >> org.apache.activemq.ra.ActiveMQRAManagedConnectionFactory.createManagedConnection(ActiveMQRAManagedConnectionFactory.java:164) >> >> >> John >> >> On Sat Jan 03 2015 at 10:42:20 AM John D. Ament <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> So I'm tinkering around a bit to port TomEE to use ActiveMQ 6 instead of >>> ActiveMQ 5.10, mostly so that we can do JMS 2.0 support. >>> >>> The original code is based around the original ActiveMQResourceAdapter. >>> I started porting the code over to use the new one, however I've run into a >>> hitch. >>> >>> If I leverage your resource adapter, I get an error: >>> >>> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: must provide either TransportType or >>> DiscoveryGroupAddress and DiscoveryGroupPort for ActiveMQ ResourceAdapter >>> Connection Factory >>> >>> at org.apache.activemq.ra.ActiveMQResourceAdapter. >>> createActiveMQConnectionFactory(ActiveMQResourceAdapter.java:1987) >>> >>> at org.apache.activemq.ra.ActiveMQResourceAdapter.setup( >>> ActiveMQResourceAdapter.java:1788) >>> >>> at org.apache.activemq.ra.ActiveMQResourceAdapter.start( >>> ActiveMQResourceAdapter.java:261) >>> >>> >>> However, there are no tests to show how to properly configure this, and I >>> can't find anything about using the resource adapter in the HornetQ docs. >>> For what I'm trying to do right now, the InVM connector is enough. How >>> would I configure the resource adapter to use the InVM connector? >>> >>> >>> I'll aim to deal with the TCP based connectors later. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> >>> John >>> >> -- Clebert Suconic http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
