[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14276913#comment-14276913
]
Soeren D commented on AMQ-4965:
-------------------------------
The fact that " the dequeue count on a topic is not very meaningful." - is very
confusing for people who start with JMS.
Please document this anywhere. I've searched so long for this information and
came across similar questions without good answers.
> Dequeue count for Topics increase for non-durable subscribers but not for
> durable subscribers
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-4965
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4965
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 5.8.0
> Reporter: Abhi
>
> Discussion:-
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-Dequeue-count-in-jconsole-0-even-after-messages-are-recieved-and-consumed-by-subscribers-tp4675875.html
> Currently, the Dequeue count metric for Topics is inconsistent in case of
> durable and non-durable subscribers. It increases for non-durable subscribers
> but not for durable subscribers. Moreover, the dequeue count on a topic is
> not very meaningful. It can be changed so that topic dequeue counts are not
> updated at all.
> Also, it would be nice if such information is properly documented somewhere
> in ActiveMQ docs as I couldn't find any information regarding this behavior
> in ActiveMQ docs.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
