Hi George, If your consumer uses low prefetch (like 1), you should get the same effect.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:01 PM, George K <gkibi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > If a solution has been identified on how to ensure that long running > transactions don't cause delays for messages from other message groups > please share. > > Basically it would work if broker only assigned messages from a *new* > message group to a free consumer and never to a consumer that is busy > processing something already. So only messages form already assigned group > can be assigned prior to dispatch. > > Without this working load balancing pretty much is broken for systems that > can encounter one off long running transactions. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-Groups-and-long-running-transactions-tp3499325p4691136.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Hiram Chirino Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. hchir...@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
