Ok, I can see how using the same coordinates could cause some confusion, What about using org.apache.activemq-6, with version starting at ="1.0"
what do you think?' On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]> wrote: > That is very true. -1 as well. > Hadrian > > On 03/19/2015 08:57 PM, artnaseef wrote: >> >> I will continue to look at this as I can find time. >> >> One question I'm seeing now - the artifact naming is using activemq- for >> the >> prefix, and a greater concern is the overlap of the artifacts like the >> followin: >> >> * activemq-ra >> * activemq-web >> >> I'm concerned that Maven central will have two sets of artifacts with the >> activemq name, which will lead to confusion for users. And, I'm >> especially >> concerned that two totally different artifacts with the same name will be >> in >> maven central. >> >> Until HornetQ becomes a replacement for ActiveMQ and we decide to stop >> maintaining ActiveMQ, I'm concerned that we need to avoid this type of >> confusion. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-6-0-0-tp4692911p4693512.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > -- Clebert Suconic http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
