Perfect, but that was not the initial promise. What you suggest, David,
can very well happen in the incubator.
The way it's done right now is actually a very hostile takeover.
Hadrian
On 03/26/2015 01:12 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I'm baffled. I have (unfortunately, wish I had more time) very marginal
involvement with activmq these days and it was obvious to me (even if wrong)
that replacing the broker was the only plausible reason to bring in hornetQ
code. So if that is the intention the obvious integration strategy to me is to
start with the new broker code and add in all the non-broker bits from activemq
5. Isn't this what has been happening? What other possible integration
strategy is there? I said it before but I'll say it again, I really don't
understand why everyone here isn't saying, wow, we just got a new broker and
some new committers who have the skills to write a broker, this is wonderful,
how many years of work does that save us, let's all pitch in and make sure it
has all the features of activemq 5 and is as compatible as we can make it.
thanks
david jencks
On Mar 26, 2015, at 12:29 PM, artnaseef <a...@artnaseef.com> wrote:
5.x needs a new core.
I think this point is really at the heart of the entire disagreement here.
The initial grant vote did not mention that HornetQ was going to be taken as
a *replacement* for the entirety of ActiveMQ. As several folks have
mentioned here, we had the impression the code was going to be made
available for merging into the ActiveMQ code base.
If the initial vote had been, "[VOTE] accept HornetQ as ActiveMQ 6 to
replace the existing code base", the results of the vote would have been
very different. It may still have passed, but there would have been this
same discussion back then before heading part-way down this path, and there
would be no reason to discuss it now.
Chris - I think you mentioned there was a vote to bring HornetQ folks into
the AMQ PMC. I don't believe that happened (someone please correct me if I
have it wrong).
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-HornetQ-ActiveMQ-s-next-generation-tp4693781p4693856.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
