If there is a “HornetQ community” separate of the “Apache ActiveMQ community” then they are not the same community.
Cheers, Chris -----Original Message----- From: Andy Taylor <andy.tayl...@gmail.com> Reply-To: <dev@activemq.apache.org> Date: Friday, March 27, 2015 at 9:35 AM To: <dev@activemq.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS} HornetQ & ActiveMQ's next generation >I agree, and that is already happening. If you look at the HornetQ >contributors there are nearly 60, we have always encouraged people to >get involved and we pro actively help them. If you look at the >ActiveMQ-6 contributors you will see some of the hornetq community is >already helping out as well as PR's from else where. > >On 27/03/15 16:07, jgenender wrote: >> Dain! Good to see you! Long time no see ;-) >> >> Dain is spot on. I'm also an old Geronimo hound. The more people >>coding >> helps create heterogeneity. I'm not against HornetQ being AMQ6... in >>fact I >> believe I supported it. >> >> The problem here is exactly what Dain pointed out. More people coding. >> BUT... what I have seen is a lot of folks *are* contributing code >>patches in >> JIRAs and those JIRAs getting ignored and no love. Recent email >>threads and >> discussion (and JIRA comments) evince this as a serious issue. The >>patches >> that seem to get accepted seem to be either from making a lot of noise >>or >> are due to affiliations. It is certainly no secret that the PMC and >>many of >> the committers have a good shade of the color red or have affiliations >>with >> the organization. The key to getting people more active is to build the >> community and nourish people's desire to contribute. That's not >>happening >> here. :-( The PMC should be making strides in making this a reality >>and its >> not happening. >> >> If HornetQ is going to be the new AMQ6... I'm all for it. But it (and >>this >> project) needs more heterogeneity. >> >> Remember the code is easy. The community is the hard part. If you >>build >> the community, the code comes for free, and like a firehose. >> >> Jeff >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >>http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-HornetQ-ActiveMQ-s-next-gen >>eration-tp4693781p4693946.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >
