I agree with Jim. If there is not (near) 100% consensus among committers, then HQ should become its own project, and there is nothing wrong with that. ASF are ridden with competing implementations and that is fully embraced here.
ยข2 from peanut gallery On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > What I don't like, from what I read, is almost virus-like > attempt to make HQ into AMQ. Virus works by invading a cell > and then using the cell itself to reproduce; the original cell > is gone, all that remains is the virus (this is incredibly > simplified, btw). It almost seems that the idea is, well, we > can't control the development of AMQ, so let's stack the > deck and make HQ the next version of AMQ and, shazam!, we now > control the direction of an Apache TLP. > > Someone on the thread called it a hostile takeover; I fail > to see how that interpretation is far from the mark. > -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
