> On Apr 8, 2015, at 3:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: > > Actually, all those concerns looks a bit weird when I think about it, given > everything was done openly : the code has been accepted, the git repo has > been named "activemq-6" and all the commits lead to messages on the mailing > list starting with "activemq-6 git commit", and that has been this way > since 5 months. So raising hands after 5 months of open development ....
I don’t get this reluctance to realize it must not have been clear given the shear number of people now objecting. Surely you can see that there was some confusion. Not everyone reads every message and it slipped by unnoticed until someone brought it to everyones attention. I don’t find that weird at all. There was some honest confusion and now everyone wants to clear up things.
