Good catch, we need to update that to reflect the HornetQ code donation instead of pointing only at Apollo.
Bruce On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:57 PM, davidthomas426 <[email protected]> wrote: > I wasn't sure where to post this, but I've seen lots of chatter here lately > about the future of ActiveMQ, voting on the name of the HornetQ donation, > Apollo, etc. > > I was trying to get information about the project the other day, and I was > very thrown off by this page: > http://activemq.apache.org/new-features-in-60.html > > That page is very misleading right now. Someone may want to fix that soon. > > Sorry if this is the wrong forum for this. I thought about creating an > issue > in the issue tracker instead, but I wasn't sure if that was appropriate for > a problem with a web page. > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Incorrect-info-on-ActiveMQ-New-features-in-6-0-web-page-tp4694932.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );' ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ Blog: http://bruceblog.org/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
