I don't really care one way or the other. However, the problem with the #activemq channel is that it's not owned by anyone who is part of the ActiveMQ project. This means that we can't even change the topic.
Bruce On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Hiram Chirino <[email protected]> wrote: > Freenode has had a registered #activemq channel for a long time. > Perhaps it's best if we keep using that. > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Jeff Genender <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I think this never got to the AMQ dev lists… just passing it along... > > > >> Begin forwarded message: > >> > >> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > >> Subject: [PROPOSAL] Move IRC channel to freenode ? > >> Date: April 6, 2015 at 10:42:23 AM MDT > >> To: Karaf Dev <[email protected]>, [email protected], > [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], > [email protected] > >> Reply-To: [email protected] > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> as you may know, codehaus will be down soon: > >> > >> http://www.codehaus.org/ > >> > >> Even if it's not clear about the future of the IRC server, I think it > makes sense to try to anticipate. > >> I propose to "move" our IRC channels to freenode (irc.freenode.net) > with the following name: > >> > >> #apache-activemq > >> #apache-archiva > >> #apache-camel > >> #apache-cxf > >> #apache-kalumet > >> #apache-karaf > >> #apache-servicemix > >> > >> WDYT ? > >> > >> Regards > >> JB > >> -- > >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >> [email protected] > >> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > > > > > -- > Hiram Chirino > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. > [email protected] | fusesource.com | redhat.com > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino > -- perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );' ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ Blog: http://bruceblog.org/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
