Dumb question... Was HornetQ based on a Reactive Programming model?
If not, I'm afraid that "AMQ Reactive" will confuse lots of people (me included). If yes, +1 ActiveMQ Reactive. If no, +1 ActiveMQ Artemis. Non-binding. *Raúl Kripalani* Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source Integration specialist http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote: > Now that we have chosen to give the HornetQ code donation a code name, > it's time to pick what that code name will be. Please select from one > of the following options: > > [a] ActiveMQ Artemis > [b] ActiveMQ Luna > [c] ActiveMQ Reactive > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. The option with the most votes will win. > > Regards, > Hiram > > -- > Hiram Chirino > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. > hchir...@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino >
