@Configuration format file
I as a user wouldn't mind either
Features I'd also like to have in v6
- Message Destinations (afaik already...)
- Virtual Destination/Topics support
- and big +1 for "Auto-creation of destinations"
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> It wasn't clear to me if the format of the Configuration file is
> really important or not. If I was the user i wouldn't mind.
>
> Users will have to change the configs anyways... things like the
> journal will have new settings... paging address... address-settings..
> other things.. but if the XML taste is a big thing it could be
> revisited.
>
> I just wanted to clear that before we jumped ahead into writing code for
> it.
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:56 AM, James Carman
> <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> > In order for ActiveMQ {CodeName} to take over as the next generation
> > of ActiveMQ, it obviously must have some level of feature parity with
> > the existing ActiveMQ 5.x (or 6.x if it's released before that
> > transition) offering. We should come up with some level of a roadmap
> > together about which features are required. Thus far, the only
> > big-ticket items that have been addressed are:
> >
> > 1. The OpenWire protocol is supported
> > 2. Auto-creation of destinations (mostly complete).
> >
> > This is obviously not all of what the existing ActiveMQ is all about.
> > What other features are folks wanting to see in the next generation
> > ActiveMQ?
> >
> > James
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suco...@jboss.com
> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>
